Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Jilemnice Occultist
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 20:47, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The Jilemnice Occultist (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
not mentioned in several notable publications. not Wikipedia-notable Lachlan Foley (talk) 06:59, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Master's Hammer. Barring the main article for the band getting deleted or put up for AfD, this would be best served by being a redirect to the band's article. I'm aware that there might be sources out there for the album that might not be on the internet due to the album getting released in the early 90s, but unless someone can find and post those sources I'm going to have to say that this album has no notability outside of the band. There are some issues with the band's article, as it currently lacks reliable sources to show notability so if the current band article gets deleted then this should ultimately be deleted.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 08:27, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or redirect; Master’s Hammer and the band’s first two albums are definitely notable, but this is not an article. --217/83 09:08, 10 September 2012 (UTC)See below. --217/83 16:07, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 15:19, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 15:19, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 08:25, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep; I improved the article, and Master’s Hammer and the band’s first two albums are definitely notable. --217/83 16:07, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep – I believe it is now established as notable. Lachlan Foley (talk) 23:21, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.